One of the things that has happened in Wisconsin as a result of Gov. Scott Walker's actions over the last 16 months is that residents are almost evenly divided on how they feel about Walker. There is only a small group of folks in the middle who have not made up their minds. Much of the conversation about dealing with Walker still centers on whether a recall is the appropriate way to resolve this situation.
The New York Times solicited letters on this topic a few weeks ago in respone to one from Mike Brost, a political science student from UW-Eau Claire, who was against the use of recalls. The Times published my response and I repeat it here for all those undecided Wisconsin voters:

PHOTO: WISCONSIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTION
Though Mr. Brost suggests that recall elections "should be reserved for instances of nefarious activity" rather than unpopular legislation, in fact, “no reason need be given for the recall in the case of a state, congressional, legislative, state judicial, or county officer,” according to the Wisconsin Blue Book 2011-12.
Our most illustrious native son, Robert M. La Follette, put it best when he said, “The recall enables the people to dismiss from public service those representatives who dishonor their commissions by betraying the public interest.” Having personally collected some of the million signatures gathered to recall Governor Walker, I can attest that there were a multitude of reasons people gave for taking this step, but breaking the public trust was one of the most common.
Wisconsinites still invoke La Follette almost 90 years after his death, because he showed us what to strive for in representative government and how to do it. “Democracy is a life,” he said, “and involves continual struggle.”
Here in Wisconsin, we have taken up that life and struggle with a vengeance. A recall election may not be the path that Mr. Brost favors, but it is just as much an indicator of a healthy democracy as his “loyal opposition.” A million of us believe that it is the best way to ensure the health and longevity of democracy in Wisconsin.
LINDA BRAZILL
Madison, Wis., April 25, 2012
You can read the letter that sparked the discussion as well as all the replies giving reasons to recall (or not) here. You can read a serious history of this subject by noted authority John D. Buenker, Emeritus Professor of History, UW-Parkside here.